The Value of Performance Weights and Discussion in Aggregated Expert Judgments

Peer-reviewed paper by Anca M. Hanea, Marissa F. McBride, Mark A. Burgman, Bonnie Wintle
Published on 17 April 2018


In risky situations characterized by imminent decisions, scarce resources, and insufficient data, policymakers rely on experts to estimate model parameters and their associated uncertainties. Different elicitation and aggregation methods can vary substantially in their efficacy and robustness. While it is generally agreed that biases in expert judgments can be mitigated using structured elicitations involving groups rather than individuals, there is still some disagreement about how to best elicit and aggregate judgments. This mostly concerns the merits of using performance-based weighting schemes to combine judgments of different individuals (rather than assigning equal weights to individual experts), and the way that interaction between experts should be handled. This article aims to contribute to, and complement, the ongoing discussion on these topics.

Read full paper

Subscribe to our mailing list to get our latest updates