Submission of Evidence to The House of Lords Select Committee on Risk Assessment and Risk Planning

CSER researchers, led by Shahar Avin, produced a unified written evidence submission that summarized our approach to defining and classifying extreme risks; the systemic nature of extreme risks; the relationship between extreme risk and global justice; and key research findings on tools for appropriately responding to extreme risks.

Abstract

In this submission we: (1) introduce our approach to defining and classifying extreme risks, including global catastrophic risks and existential risks (addressing question 1: "What do you understand the term ‘extreme risk’ to mean?"); (2) highlight two important cross-cutting themes emerging from our research, which are key to grounding risk assessment and management: (a) the systemic nature and political, technological and environmental context of extreme risks, and (b) the relationship between extreme risk and questions of global justice (addressing questions 2: "Are there types of risks to which the UK is particularly vulnerable or for which it is poorly prepared?" and question 6: "How effectively do current ways of characterising risks support evidence-based policy decisions?"); and (3) summarise our research findings on key tools for appropriately responding to extreme risks, including tools for foresight (addressing question 5: "How can the Government ensure that it identifies and considers as wide a range of risks as possible?"); tools for crafting intervention policies and ensuring their effective implementation (addressing question 7: "How effectively do Departments mitigate risks?"); tools for resilience (addressing question 10: "What challenges are there in developing resilience capability?"); and tools for governance (which go beyond the questions posed by the committee to consider the UK's role in the global governance required to address extreme risks).

Read Full Report

Subscribe to our mailing list to get our latest updates